SAF Global Decision Twin.
Interactive scenarioDay / night · current UTC
Online map imagery · fictional case
01 / Mission configuration

Design a flight scenario

Change the route, indicative aircraft fuel intensity, SAF origin and blend. The aircraft moves on the actual Cesium globe.

SAF share, scenario only35%
Assumed lifecycle reduction for SAF70%
Globe: existing Cesium engineAircraft: simulatedSources: fictional
Fuel use advances with simulated distance flown at the selected kg/km profile. Real flights vary with aircraft, payload, weather and flight phase. Fuel origin changes the illustrated supply path, not aircraft burn. Illustrative carbon proxy: 89 g CO₂e/MJ (CORSIA jet baseline) × assumed 43 MJ/kg = 3.827 t CO₂e/t fuel, multiplied by the selected lifecycle reduction and eligible scenario volume. This is not a verified SAF result, certified claim or tax calculation.
02 / Decision room

Paris → New York

Waiting for the globe…

Distance flown0 kmof — planned
Fuel consumed0.0 tof — estimated
SAF allocation—illustrative tonnes
CO₂e proxy delta—assumed lifecycle
03 / Stress event
04 / Team channel · local mockup

Select an action to preview a human decision note.

The team channel and decision log are a local prototype. No SKYBLUE account, messages, registry or AI model is connected.
Illustrative fuel supplySimulated flightAttribute path
Concept demonstration · Cinematic globe rotation; daylight follows actual UTC · Fictional figures and locations · Imagery is not proof of SAF eligibility
Live case / one connected scenario

From one flight to a decision horizon.

Change the route, aircraft profile, SAF share or incident on the globe. The flight case, annual volume, carbon proxy and evidence status below update together. All values are illustrative.

01 / Flight → annual demand

Flight scenario

Loading the scenario…

SAF requested / year—Annualized flight demand
Deliverable / year—Event and capacity applied
Assignable / year—Buyer participation applied

Method: flight fuel × SAF share × comparable flights/day × 365. Assumed repeated identical flights; capacity and buyer participation are hypothetical.

02 / Contract bridge

The horizon gap, year by year.

Example only: 12-year producer horizon versus 3-year buyer commitment. The years after buyer coverage are open, not lost fuel.

Buyer covered horizonRemaining horizon

—

03 / Carbon, with evidence gate

Potential is not an approved claim.

Calculated annual proxy—tCO₂e / year, illustrative
Externally claimable—Requires verified records
Awaiting scenario

Illustrative arithmetic: assignable SAF tonnes × 3.827 tCO₂e/t fuel (89 gCO₂e/MJ CORSIA jet baseline × assumed 43 MJ/kg) × assumed lifecycle reduction. Real claims require an agreed method, energy content, eligible quantity, lifecycle data, rights, registry retirement and review.

04 / Decision architecture

One case, four controlled questions.

FlightWhat fuel volume and SAF share does this illustrative service imply?
PortfolioWhich portion fits supply capacity and buyer participation?
EvidenceWho owns the attribute; are delivery and retirement demonstrable?
DecisionWhat can be proposed, held or investigated by an authorized team?

This browser demo reads the flight case locally. It does not retrieve live flights, producer capacity, commercial contracts, certificates or registry records. The detailed exploratory modules below have their own controls and assumptions.

VISION–SYSTÈME IA / EXTENDED ANALYSIS

From the globe to the decision.

The linked scenario above reads the globe controls. The exploratory Systems Twin, Intelligence and Mission Control modules below have their own controls and assumptions; their figures do not automatically inherit that flight case.

VISION–SYSTÈME IA / DECISION STUDIOPRIVATE CONCEPT · FICTIONAL DATA
One scenario · six evidence questions · one decision

See the gap.
Follow the evidence.

One assumption travels through strategy, the evidence chain and a meeting. This journey shows where a decision could rely on verifiable information, and where it must still wait.

Exploratory demonstration. Figures, evidence and meeting content are fictional. Cards show statements in the simulator, not reviewed records or certified reductions.

Waiting for the simulator.
—years to review
—illustrative participation
—illustrative delivery
—open evidence questions

The question that opens the case.

The scenario reads Systems Twin controls. Rates below are illustrative parameters, never a market forecast.

01 — STRATEGY
Illustrative duration gap
Pending

Load a scenario to reveal the gap between the represented horizons.

Delivered volume / scenario
—

Evidence of physical delivery is separate from a displayed percentage.

01 / SUPPLYProducer commitment
02 / BRIDGEPortfolio and buyers
03 / USEPhysical delivery
04 / CLAIM RIGHTAttribute and retirement
VISION–SYSTÈME IA / DECISION ROOMINTERACTIVE CONCEPT · FICTIONAL COLLABORATION
From model to collective action

One assumption.
One team. One decision.

A Systems Twin scenario becomes a working space: discussion, evidence requests, attribute ownership alerts and a decision note. Change the scenario and see what must be clarified before anyone acts.

Local demonstration. Roles and messages below are fictional. Add writes only to this browser page; it contacts no one. The copilot uses transparent local rules, with no connected AI model. No evidence is authenticated.
Fictional scenario ready · no connected systems
MISSION / INTERACTIVE INCIDENT

One disruption. Five connected steps.

Move step by step: each fictional event changes the case, alerts and conversation. At the end, choose a response and see what it can actually establish.

STEP 01 / 05
01 / BASELINECommitment
02 / SIGNALDelivery
03 / CONFLICTAllocation
04 / REVIEWEvidence
05 / DECISIONRecord
Baseline scenarioFictional volumes · no operational data
Reference plan
100 %
Illustrative demand
72 %
Delivered volume
80 %
Bars show relative assumptions, not validated tonnes.
8 yearshorizon to review
72 %illustrative demand
80 %illustrative delivery
2 / 5stages to clarify
02 / DECISION ROOM

SAF corridor · example case

Fictional roles: Operations · Finance · Compliance · Copilot
LOCAL / NOT SENT

This prototype sends no messages. A real messenger needs accounts, permissions, a server, suitable security and an audit.

What a real application could add: authenticated conversations, AI grounded in approved sources, versioned records, a decision trail and controlled integration with SKYBLUE. This page illustrates the product journey without pretending to be connected.

CONCEPT / 2026
OPUP - FR ===== -->